Archive for the ‘world cup’ Category

The interesting parallel that I see between the two Indian World Cup
victories – 1983 ODIs and 2007 Twenty/20 is the captains.

Where we have had suave, polished, apparently very intelligent and
thinking captains of Indian sides, like Gavaskar and Dravid, to larger
than life captains like Sachin, loners / fixers like Azhar, and
aggressive ones like Saurav, none of these chaps won us the World Cup.

The two who did, Kapil and Dhoni, are of the same breed, in a way. They play from the heart, they are truly fearless, they don’t care much for being politically right, they are game for a challenge, they never-say-die. Moreover, they give their teammates a feeling that the captain is ‘one of them’ only, and yet they are an inspiration to their teams. Most importantly, they lead from the front.

And as it turns out, it is this breed of a captain, this style that won us World Cups – now twice!

The 1983 come-back-from-brink win against Zimbabwe (from 17-5, India
went on to win, backed by a 175 runs knock from Kapil) and the first
round India-Pakistan game that India won in the bowl out, are both
significant turning points in the journey to the ultimate victory.

In that respect, the two World Cup wins have a familiar story.

Cheers.. Chak de, India!

The length of the World Cup, combined with the fact that India exited very early, has meant that people in India have nearly forgotten that the World Cup is going on. Some of us fans of genuine cricket (without the patriotic craziness) have followed the Cup through the Super 8 stage.

Now, we finally approach the knock out rounds, where ‘winner takes all’! The first semi-final is scheduled for today, New Zealand vs Sri Lanka. Bond vs Jayasuriya, Vaas vs Fleming, Murali vs Styris, Vettori vs Mahela… etc. Yes, I am trying to hype it up, like the media usually do!! Trying to put some spice into the game…

The fact is that, it will be a great game. I am a solid Sri Lanka fan at this time, and I expect them to win today. I also expect them to put up a tough fight in the finals thereafter, whether they play South Africa or Australia.

One or the other way, its three good one day games coming up.

On the question of the World Cup format, much as the ICC is defending it (they do not have a choice, do they?), the fact remains that it was one long and boring structure. I quite like the suggestion that one expert gave – that 2 teams from the non-Test playing countries should make it, and then, the 10 teams (including these two) should play each other once. The best 4 of the teams, after this, should make it to the semi-finals, and then the finals. Should be fair to all, as they get a chance to play all the rest and not just have a bad break of the draw.

… or some may say, the lack of it!! Strategy, I mean..!

Maybe I am just too much of a fan of Sri Lanka’s, or maybe I am able to see another perspective, which I present here.

Before that, for those of you who came in late, here is what happened.
Sri Lanka was playing Australia in one of the tougher Super 8 games in the World Cup. Both teams have more or less confirmed their positions in the semi-finals, so it was not a crucial game from the semi-finals point of view. But it was an important game for each team to get a psychological advantage, as they are quite likely to meet each other again, in the semi-finals or the finals.

Then, in what looked like a very strange move, Sri Lanka ‘rested’ their top 3 bowlers, for this game, Muralitharan, Vaas and Malinga. Malinga, to be fair, had not played the previous game too, as he was injured, so we can assume that he still needed to get well. But Vaas and Murali had been playing all along, and of course, performing very well too, and so it was a surprise to not find them in the eleven, for this crucial encounter.

The captain, Jayawardene, explains that these two chaps have had injuries earlier and in order to ensure that they do not develop any problems, and considering that the place in the semis was settled, he chose to rest them.

Experts like Ian Chappell and Arjuna Ranatunga were shocked beyond words. Chappell went to the extent to suggest that the ICC’s anti-corruption cell should enquire with Sri Lanka, as to why they did not play their best team. He was also upset for the sake of the fans, who had come to see the best teams play.

Well, here is what I feel about this matter.

Sri Lanka have a good team, but of course, Australia is a different peak to climb! For ANY team to beat Australia, whether in the Super 8, or in the later knock-out stages of the World Cup, they would need to do something different. Kind of bring in a surprise factor and hope to upset Australia’s rhythm. And Sri Lanka as a team and perhaps with Tom Moody’s inputs, might have worked on this gamble.

Think about it:
1. If, without the key bowlers, Sri Lanka managed to beat Australia, what a phenomenal boost they would have got, and how depressed Australia would have been, in that case,

2. If, without the key bowlers, Sri Lanka managed to take the fight to Australia, and lost, then too, they have a psychological advantage. They tell themselves that ‘they lost because the stars were not there, and yet, without the stars, they gave a tough fight to Australia’! And what does Australia think? That Sri Lanka, minus their extremely good three bowlers, were a handful. What will happen when we meet them again, in the knock-out stage, and when those top bowlers will also be there??

This, in fact, is what happened. That Sri Lanka fought back from being 24-3 to post a total of 220+ was a big thing. At a time when Jayawardene and Chamara Silva were going strong, it appeared that Australia were clearly lost on ideas. Similarly, with a rank ordinary attack, to get Hayden and Gilchrist thinking about the bowling initially, and also picking up both of their wickets early, was also creditable. If Australia wanted to make an impact, they should have been able to take the game with 10 wickets to spare.. they could not do that!

3. All these three bowlers have different styles and are a handful to cope with. For the best of batsmen. There is so much in ‘studying’ their styles on video and there is a different sense of confidence in playing against them, and overcoming the mystery. Not getting that opportunity in the Super 8 ensures that when they meet in the knock-out, the Sri Lanka bowlers start with the upper hand. Why?

– if the batsmen try to be aggressive and aim to dominate say, a Murali, he is quite likely to pick up wickets
– if they play watchfully, they will let a lot of economical overs come and go

This, then becomes the surprise plan that Sri Lanka spring on Australia, and give them their best chance to beat Australia in the semis or the finals!

I think it was a smart move. Also speaks for the confidence that Sri Lanka has. That they were willing to take the risk of losing this game, in the larger interest of winning the tournament later.

I continue to back them to be the ultimate champions this time..! Yes, inspite of Australia’s amazing run. I mean, backing Australia to win does not require any imagination, but thinking that there is a team, in this case, Sri Lanka, who can possibly upset the Australian team, requires a little specific conviction. I have that!!

For what was supposed to be a key match between two teams who had been giving winning performances at the World Cup, the New Zealand-Sri Lanka tie ended up being fairly one sided after all.

Right from the start when Vaas pinned the NZ batsmen down, it was always an uphill task for New Zealand. They struggled to put up any serious total, and if it was not for a late flourish, and some good batting by Styris, New Zealand would have managed just about 170 runs or so.

Sri Lanka batted with utmost maturity and comfortably paced themselves to victory. Their one star batsman, who had struggled for runs, Sangakara, spent good time at the wicket, and steered the team to a well deserved victory.

Head to head, there were a few key matchups, basically from the point of view to compare relative performances. And Sri Lanka were winners all the way:

Vaas vs Bond: both of them had been bowling very well, in the World Cup. Vaas came out looking much better than Bond. Jayasuriya and Sangakara were very comfortable against Bond, whereas all NZ batsmen struggled against Vaas.

Murali vs Vettori: not such a big match up, but just from the point of view of being one of the emerging spinners, Vettori usually commands respect. But again, it was Murali who came out looking so much the winner.

Captaincy: Fleming is certainly a shrewder captain than Jayawardene. But inspite of his best efforts, the team was outplayed by Sri Lanka, and he could not make a difference.

All in all, Sri Lanka continues to impress me, and they are going about their tasks in a matter-of-fact manner, keeping a low profile, without any hype. They have the innate ability and the form at this time, to challenge Australia.

Interesting aside – where Sri Lanka paced themselves comfortably against a keen NZ bowling attack, to get 220+ chasing, on the other hand, England struggled against Bangladesh, to get some 140-odd runs. They lost 6 wickets before scampering to victory there!

None of the ruckus would have happened.
In Indian cricketing world, in the Indian media, with the BCCI, amongst the players, etc.
If only the Bangladesh – South Africa game had happened earlier.. !

The Indian team crashed out of the World Cup, because they lost to Bangladesh. The world (well, the billion Indians at least) was shocked because India lost to Bangladesh. “How can they lose to lowly Bangladesh?”, the world asked!

If Indian had beaten Bangladesh and then lost to Sri Lanka (which was always possible, and could have been acceptable too), India would have still made it to the Super 8 stage, lost their badly, and then returned home. The noise levels would have been lower, the advertisers and sponsors would have enjoyed a few weeks more of television viewership, and a general stability would have prevailed.

But that did not happen, and the floodgates of criticism were opened.

Because of the fundamental question, “How could India lose to Bangladesh?”

Things would have been different though, if Bangladesh had met South Africa earlier and beaten South Africa, as they did yesterday.

THEN, the scenario changes dramatically.
Bangladesh is a great cricket team. One that can beat the number one team in the world rankings, South Africa. They are a turnaround team, a champion team. Etc.

Now, after that, if India lost of Bangladesh, it would not matter. After all, if the top team in the world, South Africa, can lose to Bangladesh, then its not such a bad thing for India to lose to them now, is it?

But fate had it otherwise, and the India-Bangladesh game happened a lot earlier, and all the worst things that had to happen for the Indian players, the BCCI, the media, the sponsors, the advertisers, etc., there was ample time for all of that to happen!

Oh well..

What a great giant killer performance by Bangladesh.
And as for South Africa, with everything going for them, they are still going to find a way to lose. Australia-Sri Lanka final, is my tip now!

After the early exits of India and Pakistan from the cricket World Cup, the chances of an Asian team emerging victorious, reduced. There were still two teams from Asia, left in the running, viz. Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. In reality, while Bangladesh has done creditably to make it to the Super Eight stage, no one is going to give it any chance for becoming the ultimate winners here. They can cause a little flutter here and there, but surely they do not have a chance to go all the way.

That left Sri Lanka. The one team from Asia, with a half chance of going all the way. At the outset, when the World Cup started, most critics gave Sri Lanka an outside chance to make it to the semi finals stage. That was about it.

Having seen them play in the recent matches, I have a much much higher respect for the team, and I just feel that their quiet, no-nonsense, low profile approach, might actually see them going far, and perhaps all the way too.

Let me ennumerate the reasons I feel thus:
1. Sri Lanka had a dream run in ODIs last year, where they won a very high percentage of their games, soon after Jayawardene took over as captain, in absence of Atapatu. Amongst their big series wins was the 5-0 washout of England in England. Now whatever you think of the English team, beating them 5-0 in England is no mean achievement. And in all of those victories, Sri Lanka looked eminently confident to take the game, in spite of whatever resistance England was putting up, each time.

2. Only in recent past, just before the World Cup, doubts were raised about Sri Lanka’s abilities, as they came to India and lost. What we did not realize is that the Sri Lanka team very purposely rested their star bowlers, Vaas and Muralitharan, for this India trip, coming so close before the World Cup, as it did. Only India and West Indies played their best teams, and took the risks of injuries and fatigue so close before the WC! So Sri Lanka’s loss in India before the WC may be taken with a pinch of salt, on account of their depleted bowling strength.

3. Attitude wise, Sri Lanka is SO different from India and Pakistan. Its surprising that a subcontinental team has such a different style, compared to the other 2 big boys in the area. At the outset, they seem to have far less politicization about their cricket, compared to India and Pakistan. They seem to focus on cricket first and foremost, and other factors follow in priority. The egos of cricketers seem to be far lower. They carry no airs about them. Except for Ranatunga and Murali who have been somewhat vocal about their feelings against Australia, especially, you scarcely hear a word of controversy from their players. And even with regards to Murali, it was a clear case of self-defense. The Aussie press and public really harried him down. And as far as Ranatunga goes, I do not know of a more wily cricketer, one who is extremely proud of his country and the team, and who will play whatever card is necessary to get victory. It was his cunning and Aravinda’s dash that made them World Cup winners, few years back. So his words are always having a strategy behind them, I am pretty sure.
In other respects, the Sri Lanka team, from Murali and Jayasuriya down to all the newcomers and youngsters, seem to be prepared to listen to their coach and work hard. Murali and Jayasuriya are clear revelations as fielders, at this World Cup. That shows the kind of commitment and respect to the coaches, that they show. Which is of course, how it should be. Except that their more famous sub-continental cousins don’t seem to think so!

4. All through this World Cup, we have seen the Sri Lanka team showing clearly, how each of the players knows his role. About how they seem to be playing to a common goal for the team, and not for individual glory. Players like Dilshan and Chamara Silva are embodiments of average players, knowing their clear tasks, and doing just that, without fanfare. When the team loses early wickets, it is for them to curb risky shots, take quick singles, don’t go crazy with airy shots, stay till 40th-42nd overs, and then start increasing the pace. They have had to do this on more than one occasion, and they did well. So also did Russell Arnold. A veritable batsman in his own right, but coming at number 7. Vaas has his work cut out. Strangle the batsmen early, not allowing them to make runs, and pick up a couple of wickets. He does that to a tee. Malinga has to fire early and see if he can hustle out a batsman early on. If not, he comes back with reverse swing and his unique action, to pick up wickets in a second spell. And so on. Each person knows their role. And they do it just fine.

5. Be it the batting order or the bowling order, there is a basic strategy which is followed, without going into too many random experiments. Like how India did, and like how West Indies was forced to attempt yesterday in their game against Sri Lanka. The Sri Lanka team follows a set batting order, the team is more or less constant (which means, ex-captain, Atapatu cools his heels in the dressing room, never mind that; could we have done that to Ganguly?!). Yes, one may argue, that if it does not work, then you think of making changes. Yes, true. But when a certain strategy has been finalized well in advance, and players have worked at it for long, that stable strategy has been fine tuned and works. And which then, as a consequence, does not demand constant tweaking! Its like a positive spiral.

6. I was most impressed by Sangakara’s interview with Michael Holding, after they beat West Indies yesterday. First of all, I think Sangakara is one of the most intelligent crickets on the cirtuit today. And my opinion is not based on his interview of yesterday (although the opinion only got further strengthened) but on the basis of all the articles of his that I have read. While articles of cricketers could well be ghost written by others, I do feel that the gist of the thought process has to be that of the cricketer, and considering that, if you read Sangakara’s writings, you realise that he ia a sharp cricketing brain. When he spoke to Holding yesterday, after one of the biggest wins in World Cup (at least against a non-minnow team), there was absolutely no going overboard. There was a clear attitude that came out like ‘a task needed to be done, which we did, and also that we have a few more games to win, and we are focusing on that’. I suspect that is also the team’s attitude. In fact, as they picked up wickets, the bowlers were not jumping up and down, like they had scaled Mount Everest. There was some celebration, but beyond that, it appeared like ‘this is what I am supposed to do, and I am doing just that, so what’s the big deal here’! Even as Dilshan hammered a six off the last ball, and took the total beyond 300, there was not even a smile on his face, as he walked back to the pavilion with his teammate. His face seemed to show something like ‘so okay, we have got 300+ now, and we have to go back to the field and make sure that we get them out in less than this score’. No sense of a big time achievement. Similarly, Jayasuriya actually seemed to feel bad that he got out when he did, when there was a task still to be done. Or in fact, when Vaas got Bravo with a beauty, you could be mistaken to believe that Vaas was on his way to a funeral. He had no emotions of joy or celebration on his face. Basically what I am seeing is that they are work oriented, and they are fully prepared to delay the gratification till the end result is achieved.

7. Another incident I remember, was a press conference addressed by Jayawardene, around the time when they lost in India, before the World Cup, and when he himself was going through a rough patch in terms of form. He stated in a very matter of fact manner, and very sincerely too, that ‘only the best team needs to be picked for the World Cup; I have not been in good form, and if the selectors think that someone else will be a better option, they must drop me, if they feel someone else will make a better captain, they must replace me, but the most important task is for us to put our best foot forward for the world cup’. It was a genuine and sincere comment, and not just ‘drama’. I was very impressed. This kind of selfless spirit is seen on the ground too. With a slight exception of Murali (and he being really so special, can be excused on this ground), no one else seems to show even the slightest hint of ego, or selfishness. From Vaas to Jayasuriya to Sangakara, all of them are prepared to be playing for the team, whatever it takes. Likewise, Atapatu sitting in the pavilion.

8. Finally in summary, their actual strengths are worth recalling. Jayasuriya at the top, is amongst the best in the world, and is in good nick too. Thiranga has also done well in recent months, and comes with confidence. He needs to get a good score and he will be on his way. With Jayawardene, Sangakara both very effective and talented, to follow, and then the so called bit players who are in great form, Chamara Silva, Dilsha and Arnold, the Sri Lanka batting appears to be in good shape. Also they have all kinds of batsmen. Players who can stay at the wicket, milks singles and twos and who can also blast out and hit big winners. Players like Sangakara, Arnold, Silva and Dilshan fall in this dual role capability. Jayawardene is a little patient, like an Atapatu and Jayasuriya is a blaster, much needed at the top. There are left and right handers, so in short, there is great balance in batting.
Coming to the bowling, Vaas leads the way. For all the noise that we make about the more high profile pacers on display, like McGrath, Pollock, Bond, for my money, I think Vaas is the best pace bowler at the World Cup, at this time. He does not need any warming up – he is on the dot, from ball 1. He has great variety, without the risk of being expensive. He has a phenomenal economy rate, and is always good to pick up wickets. The balls that he got DeVillers and Bravo with, against South Africa and West Indies respectively, were absolute beauties. A true champion. As supporting case in the pace battery, Malinga, Fernando and Maharoof are able allies. Malinga is a little ahead of the pack, as he seems to be in good form right now. But otherwise, all three of them are not world beaters, but are extremely effective. I think the coaching has really helped them to make them come out looking far better than their talents. And in spin, there is range. Of course, Jayasuriya and Murali and the regulars. Murali undoubtedly is the best spinner on display at the World Cup (in that sense, Sri Lanka have the best paceman Vaas and the best spinner, Murali, in their teams; quite an enviable situation). Jayasuriya has worked so well on his bowling, that he could even command his place in the side, for his bowling alone. He ensures that runs are kept under control and can pick up wickets every once in a while. And for the supporting case, bowlers like Dilshan and Arnold do a good job. The batting team cannot think of running away merrily, on the ‘fifth’ bowler’s expense. Again, you will see that the bowling options are very varied, and this variety is a strength. Sri Lanka’s fielding is looking comparable to the South African and Australian varieties. Sangakara is a very smart wicketkeeper. His standing close to the wickets to Vaas, accounted for Lara yesterday. He also got another stumping. The outfield and the catching talents are also very good, and here again, the coaching staff have done wonders for the team. I would give a lot of credit to Tom Moody, the coach, in achieving this transformation for Sri Lanka. Of course, he may not be a lot different from Greg Chappell, but he has wards who listen to him, unlike what Chappell has!

With all this going for them, and with very level heads that the Sri Lankans have, I think they are in an excellent position to go all the way. While they lost a close match to another contender, South Africa, we will see how they do against Australia and New Zealand. Even if they don’t do so well in the Super Eight, as long as they get to the semi-finals, I think they will raise their game to a different level, and take it all, and become the champions!

As the Indian team sneaked into the country, unannounced, in late night flights, the papers were full of their photos, their better halves escorting them out from the airports, in most cases. Faces glum, the smiles missing, fearing a possible fan revolt, etc.

Seeing these, I realized that this was a rare occasion in recent years, that the teams had gone without their better halves, for a tour. A little explored factoid, this one, may actually be the most important reason for India’s loss. That they did not have the motivation and encouragement that they usually get from their wives, standing beside them, and secondly, missing the wives so much, the team chose to exit and come back to the wives sooner rather than later!!

And we keep barking at the wrong trees, like selectors, board, players’ performances, etc. A resolution should be immediately passed at the board level, that wives should compulsorily accompany the players, on all tours. And if a wife refuses to go, for any reason, or for the bachelors in the team, the board undertakes to arrange alternatives like girlfriends for such players. Then you see, the World Cup will be ours!!

The other funny piece that I picked up in the papers was the announcement of the Twenty/Twenty cricket teams, including the Mumbai team. Announcing the selection, the Mumbai chief selector Dilip Vengsarkar (also the chief national selector) conveyed that Sachin, Zaheer and Agarkar have been ‘rested’ and are therefore not made a part of the Mumbai 20/20 team.

These are the three Mumbai players who were in the World Cup squad, and who returned back.

They are “rested”??
They need a rest from what??
From playing all of THREE one day games??
Are they so tired that they need to rest, after such a no-show??

That is as funny as it gets. The selectors cannot find any new words to justify a non-selection. Little realizing that using senseless words like ‘rested’, they are making a mockery. Why not just state the truth – whatever it may be. If you want the fans to behave with maturity, start by being transparent to them, and not beat around the bush.

Can a team win a big event like the World Cup in cricket, without having genuine heroes or characters?

Was the Indian team that won the World Cup in 1983 a team like that? Well, Kapil Dev was a character for sure. So, I would not call it a team without any heroes. But yes, other than Kapil, the rest of the team was pretty much, average chaps.

Pakistan as a World Cup winner, had of course, Imran Khan and Javed Miandad, two amazing characters. Sri Lanka, in their win, had a Jayasuriya and an Aravinda D’Silva, not to speak of their most amazing captain ever, Ranatunga.

Which brings me to the current World Cup and the teams in the reckoning. Leaving Ireland and Bangladesh aside, lets examine the rest of the teams, and see if there are heroes or larger than life characters present, in these teams.

Australia of course, has Ponting. But they also have awesome heroes like Gilchrist and McGrath, and budding ones like Hussey and Clarke. And then there is Symonds.

So yes, Australia may only have an excess of them!

South African characters would include guys like Smith at the top, followed by Kallis, Gibbs, Pollock and Boucher. People with fan followings, people who are capable to turning things around on their own, guys who have done it few times, people with a certain style about them.

Which is why, in the above two teams, if one had to pick a single name each, it would have to be Ponting and Smith respectively. The style and aplomb with which they bat and lead their sides from the front qualifies them, for these unique positions.

Then coming to Sri Lanka. Certainly its got to be Murali. What a character.. he is an enigma of sorts, almost a magician like figure. A big wide smile each time he gets a wicket, or even when he takes a catch or fields well or throws his bat around to score some runs. Other names to be picked could include Sangakara, Malinga and Vaas. But Murali is streets ahead.

England has Flintoff and Peitersen. Both have a certain style and confidence to be the heroes of their teams, and aptly become the characters for England. Panesar is the only other name that comes to mind, but more so, because he is a Sikh, and stands out, and has that oriental spinning magic. But he has a long way to go.

The West Indies have Lara. Again, like in case of Sri Lanka, he is the one man who is streets ahead of all others. Quite like a Viv Richards before him, the absolute confidence justifies the tag for him. He can take on complete teams single handedly, and as long as he is on the crease, no matter if 9 wickets are down, the opposite team cannot heave a sigh of relief! Other characters in West Indies would include Gayle and perhaps, Chanderpaul. Bravo is an emerging one, and if he justifies the potential that he shows, he could be their future character!

That brings us to New Zealand. Where from actually this thought came to my mind, in the first place. I find that New Zealand as a team, does NOT have any such characters! Yes, guys like Oram, Mcmillan, Bond, Vettori, have flirted with the tag, but they still do not really ‘own’ the character tag! None of them. Least of all, their captain, Fleming. And yet, they could be the genuine dark horse of the World Cup, to challenge Australia, South Africa and Sri Lanka.

So, to repeat my question from the beginning of this post, “Can a team win a big event like the World Cup in cricket, without having genuine heroes or characters?”.
I am not sure. We will see if New Zealand gets there.. then, we will know the answer to this.

Oh, by the way, I do not want to talk about teams that are already eliminated, as to whether they had any characters or not. Which is why India and Pakistan are not even mentioned here.

That is the one word that I can use for the entire World Cup campaign of India. Various observations on what went wrong for India:
1. It seems that India was the only team at the start of the Cup, which was not clear about the likely 11. Or even the likely 12. Will Pathan play, will Sehwag play, will it be Kumble or Bhajji, will Karthik play, etc. Most teams, had a basic best 11 in place, with likelihood of minor tweaking to be done on a game to game basis.

2. What follows as a consequence of 1, is that we did not have a perfect batting order decided. Who will open, was the first big question. In order to ‘accommodate’ Sehwag, there was likelihood of any kind of jugglery in the batting order. All these kinds of open ends, when you are well into the world cup, was uniquely Indian!

3. What is the sense in saying that Bangladesh bowled well?? Heck, you have 3 chaps with 10000+ runs each, where the opposite team does not have a total of 10000 runs. And yet, you do not have the skills or the experience to play against those bowlers, who may have bowled well on that day??

4. I cannot also understand this statement that media uses often, that ‘cricket is a game of uncertainties’. Tell that to the Aussies. Or the South Africans. Is there any uncertainty about the way they go about their game? Sure, win or loss is a different matter. But you cannot justify your pathetic display under that guise of uncertainty. When you have 5-6 apparently top class batsmen, the uncertainty factor is restricted to 1-2 of them getting out cheaply or getting an unfortunate decision or run out, or something like that. The uncertainty is REMOVED by the rest of them making up for those 1-2 losses, by playing better and ensuring that the team gets runs. We have a case of all of them succumbing to stupid play.

5. Most professional teams today give roles to team members, and they are apt to perform those roles. Against India, after losing a few early wickets, Chamara Silva and Dilshan knew that they had to stay at the wicket, even if it meant just milking singles and making 1s into 2s. No extravagant shots. Nothing in the air. They did that. Put their heads down. Did Indian batting give ANY resemblance of having ANY such plan in their heads? Or even if they had one, were the guys looking like they were attempting to implement that?? Was it panic that said ‘we will not survive if we just hang around here, so might as well make the runs quickly, and get done’?? That can be the only explanation of Uthapa and Ganguly’s mad rush initially, and also for Sehwag to keep going aerially, even after having lost the openers quickly. There is ALWAYS a chance that you will get out that way. Can’t you curb your aerial shots and play a safer game, and hang out, to ensure victory??

6. I, for one, had thought that if India progresses in the World Cup, it will be on account of its bowlers. I had a lot more hope from Zaheer, Munaf, Ajit and whoever else was going to be with them, like Sreesanth or Kumble or even Pathan. They did not do as well as they could have. A lot of extras given. Line and length not kept perfect and thus allowing the batsmen to get out of the pressure, with occasional boundaries. Letting the latter half of the team make a lot of runs, even after having got the earlier wickets. I mean, we should have restricted Bangladesh below 191 and we should have won. It was Bangladesh after all. Similarly, we should have finished off Sri Lanka in lesser than 200, after the decent start. In fact, how could we let a Bermuda batsman take 76 off us? Where is really our great bowling skill? It is in this department that Sri Lanka score over India. With guys like Vaas and Murali leading, and extremely decent options in Malinga, Fernando and Jayasuriya, they are much better placed.

Indian cricket appears to be going the hockey way. Of course, in cricket, unlike hockey, we never ‘ruled’. But like in hockey, where we kept focusing on the brilliant talent that we had, but never on strategy to win, similarly in cricket, we may hold all the individual records and have the highest averages and aggregates, but when it comes to winning games, we will be left behind. We are not focusing on the winning strategies and not executing at the individual levels.

Its been a few days since India unceremoniously bowed out of the World Cup. I have been coming to terms with the situation and hence the delay in posting these views.

I would like to look at three aspects to this debacle, and will cover these in three separate posts:

1. What went wrong – from a pure cricketing perspective

2. Betting, match fixing, too much money, fans’ pressure – could these have played a role?

3. What next? Where does India go from here

Check the three posts on the above points, that follow this one.